ֱ̽ of Cambridge - Roberto Foa /taxonomy/people/roberto-foa en Search engine data reveals Russian discontent after invasion of Ukraine /stories/russia-web-search <div class="field field-name-field-content-summary field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><p>Russian military mobilisations saw huge spikes in anti-regime web searches, according to a study of search trends from Google and Yandex.</p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 17 May 2023 08:07:10 +0000 fpjl2 239001 at War in Ukraine widens global divide in public opinion /stories/worlddivided <div class="field field-name-field-content-summary field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><p>'Mega-dataset' of public opinion covering 97% of the planet finds a 'world divided' between liberal US-backing populations and illiberal nations favouring China and Russia.</p> </p></div></div></div> Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:57:42 +0000 fpjl2 234801 at Support for populist politics 'collapsed' during the pandemic – global report /stories/populismandcovid <div class="field field-name-field-content-summary field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><p>Support for populist parties and leaders – and agreement with populist ideas – has fallen around the world amid the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a new Cambridge report.</p> </p></div></div></div> Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:38:55 +0000 fpjl2 229261 at Faith in democracy: millennials are the most disillusioned generation ‘in living memory’ /stories/youthanddemocracy <div class="field field-name-field-content-summary field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><p>Young people’s faith in democratic politics is lower than any other age group, and millennials across the world are more disillusioned with democracy than Generation X or baby boomers were at the same stage of life.</p> </p></div></div></div> Tue, 20 Oct 2020 07:41:00 +0000 fpjl2 218852 at Lockdown led to happiness rebound, after wellbeing plunged with onset of pandemic /research/news/lockdown-led-to-happiness-rebound-after-wellbeing-plunged-with-onset-of-pandemic <div class="field field-name-field-news-image field-type-image field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><img class="cam-scale-with-grid" src="/sites/default/files/styles/content-580x288/public/news/research/news/lockdown.jpg?itok=MyqgO7Kw" alt="" title="Young boy peers out of his bedroom window during the coronavirus lockdown in the UK in April. , Credit: Benjamin Cooper" /></div></div></div><div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> ֱ̽coronavirus outbreak caused life satisfaction to fall sharply, but lockdown went a long way to restoring contentment – even reducing the 'wellbeing inequality' between well-off professionals and the unemployed, <a href="https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/publications/covid-19-and-subjective-well-being/">according to a new study</a>.</p> <p>Researchers from Cambridge’s Bennett Institute for Public Policy used a year’s worth of data taken from weekly YouGov surveys and Google searches to track wellbeing in the British population before and during the pandemic.</p> <p>They say it is one of the first studies to distinguish the effects of the pandemic from those of lockdown on psychological welfare, as it uses week-by-week data, rather than monthly or annual comparisons.  </p> <p> ֱ̽proportion of Britons self-reporting as 'happy' halved in just three weeks: from 51% just before the UK’s first COVID-19 fatality, to 25% by the time national lockdown began.  </p> <p>This reversed under lockdown, with happiness climbing back to almost pre-pandemic levels of 47% by the end of May. Overall life satisfaction saw a similar drop when the pandemic took hold and a rebound during lockdown. </p> <p> ֱ̽study also suggests that while the 'wellbeing inequality' gap remained wide, lockdown started to shrink it: some of the most deprived social groups saw a relative rise in life satisfaction, while the wealthy experienced declines. </p> <p>“It was the pandemic, not the lockdown, that depressed people’s wellbeing,” said Dr Roberto Foa, from Cambridge’s Department of Politics and International Studies, and Director of the YouGov-Cambridge Centre for Public Opinion Research.<br /> <br /> “Mental health concerns are often cited as a reason to avoid lockdown. In fact, when combined with employment and income support, lockdown may be the single most effective action a government can take during a pandemic to maintain psychological welfare.”</p> <p>Foa had exclusive access to results from the YouGov Weekly Mood Tracker survey, and conducted the study with Bennett Institute colleagues Sam Gilbert and Dr Mark Fabian. <a href="https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/publications/covid-19-and-subjective-well-being/"> ֱ̽findings are published today on the Institute’s website</a>.</p> <p>In addition to YouGov data from England, Scotland and Wales, the researchers expanded their study to cover seven other nations – Ireland, the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India and South Africa – using the Google Trends tool.</p> <p>“By matching survey data with internet searches for mental health topics such as anxiety, depression, boredom and apathy, we were able to compare the UK to a wider set of countries,” said Sam Gilbert.</p> <p>“In country after country we saw a sharp rise in negative mood during initial outbreaks of the novel coronavirus, but then a rapid recovery once lockdowns were introduced,” Gilbert said.</p> <p> ֱ̽team also used Google Trends to investigate suicide-related search terms. They discovered a significant fall during lockdown months in several countries, including the UK and Ireland, but a rise in nations that implemented lockdowns without extensive income support, such as India and South Africa.</p> <p>Foa and colleagues suggest that this change in web searches around suicidal ideation may relate to the effect of lockdowns on 'underemployed' men: those of working age who are unemployed or clocking very few hours.</p> <p>This is one of the highest risk groups for suicide, but also the social group that saw the largest relative increase in life satisfaction during lockdown – in Britain, at least – according to YouGov data.</p> <p>Just before lockdown, 47% of underemployed men reported feeling stressed. After two months, this had fallen to 30% – the lowest level for a year.</p> <p>By late May, 40% of underemployed men self-reporting as “happy”, above the pre-pandemic average of 36% (June 2019-February 2020), with 15% describing themselves as “inspired” compared to 4% at the start of the year. </p> <p>In fact, underemployed men saw a relative gain in life satisfaction during lockdown that was higher than their previous peak of Christmas 2019. </p> <p>“During lockdown, welfare schemes were expanded and hardship funds introduced, along with amnesties on overdue rent and bills. This probably reduced stress for people living precariously,” said Roberto Foa.</p> <p>“In addition, people with little money don’t consume or travel as much, so may have had less to lose and more to gain from lockdown.”</p> <p>This is in contrast to high social status groups, the managers and top professionals, who saw a small but persistent slump in life satisfaction that lockdown only slightly alleviated.</p> <p>“Well-paid professionals may have experienced stress through combined work and domestic duties, and an inability to engage in consumption habits that have a social basis, from holidays to dining out,” said Dr Foa.   </p> <p> ֱ̽over-65s also saw a fall in life satisfaction that lingered into lockdown, which the study’s authors suggest may result from increased COVID-19 fatality fears.</p> <p>In general, women experienced a steeper decline in wellbeing than men at the pandemic’s onset. For women co-habiting with partners, family or friends, however, life satisfaction then recovered during lockdown.</p> <p>For women living alone there was very little rebound. ֱ̽isolation of single occupancy in lockdown appears to have negatively affected women in particular, say the researchers.</p> <p>Overall, however, they say that lockdown may have gone a surprisingly long way in ameliorating severe mental health effects of the early pandemic.</p> <p>Dr Mark Fabian added: “Contrary to widespread concerns, lockdowns seem to improve wellbeing rather than detract from it during a pandemic, not least because they reduce the risk of infection.”</p> <p>“However, as the initial shock of the pandemic fades into a likely recession, and worries about jobs and income return, the real mental health challenge may just be beginning.”<br />  </p> <h2>How you can support Cambridge's COVID-19 research effort</h2> <p><a href="https://www.philanthropy.cam.ac.uk/give-to-cambridge/cambridge-covid-19-research-fund" title="Link: Make a gift to support COVID-19 research at the ֱ̽">Donate to support COVID-19 research at Cambridge</a></p> </div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-content-summary field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><p>New study is among the first to distinguish effects of the pandemic from effects of lockdown when it comes to wellbeing in Britain.</p> </p></div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-content-quote field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Lockdown may be the single most effective action a government can take during a pandemic to maintain psychological welfare</div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-content-quote-name field-type-text field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Roberto Foa</div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-image-credit field-type-link-field field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><a href="https://www.mildenhall.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2143409/raf-mildenhall-airman-maintains-resilience-amid-covid-19/" target="_blank">Benjamin Cooper</a></div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-image-desctiprion field-type-text field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Young boy peers out of his bedroom window during the coronavirus lockdown in the UK in April. </div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-cc-attribute-text field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" rel="license"><img alt="Creative Commons License" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" style="border-width:0" /></a><br /> ֱ̽text in this work is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>. Images, including our videos, are Copyright © ֱ̽ of Cambridge and licensors/contributors as identified.  All rights reserved. We make our image and video content available in a number of ways – as here, on our <a href="/">main website</a> under its <a href="/about-this-site/terms-and-conditions">Terms and conditions</a>, and on a <a href="/about-this-site/connect-with-us">range of channels including social media</a> that permit your use and sharing of our content under their respective Terms.</p> </div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-show-cc-text field-type-list-boolean field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">Yes</div></div></div><div class="field field-name-field-license-type field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above"><div class="field-label">Licence type:&nbsp;</div><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><a href="/taxonomy/imagecredit/attribution">Attribution</a></div></div></div> Sun, 26 Jul 2020 23:03:39 +0000 fpjl2 216572 at Global dissatisfaction with democracy at a record high /stories/dissatisfactiondemocracy <div class="field field-name-field-content-summary field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><p>A new report, the first from the ֱ̽'s new Centre for the Future of Democracy, finds that 2019 had the "the highest level of democratic discontent" since 1995.</p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:41:52 +0000 fpjl2 210872 at