̽��ֱ�� of Cambridge - Office of External Affairs and Communications

Unexpected experiences: Lucy Spokes talks about the excitement of a newly digital Festival

zs332 — Wed, 29 Jul 2020 07:00:56 +0000

Head of Public Engagement, Dr Lucinda Spokes, describes the difficult decision to pull the plug on the 26th Cambridge Science Festival in March this year and reflects on the breathtaking flexibility of the Festival going digital – at least for now.

Science Live

dwc34 — Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:52:07 +0000

From intimate science cafes to massive science festivals, the public science events sector encompasses an enormous diversity of activity involving a huge range of practitioners and target audiences. As unique as each event is, public science events are all live, in-person programs, designed to engage the public with science in a social context that is at least as meaningful as the content and messages delivered. This activity is already taking place on a grand scale in both the US and UK, and having a direct impact in a variety of ways. ̽��ֱ��Science Live project is a first significant step forward in a long-term effort to widen access to the beneficial impacts of public science events, better understand these impacts and how they are produced, and uncover new opportunities for engaging society with science.

Researchers at Cornell ̽��ֱ�� and the ̽��ֱ�� of the West of England (UWE), Bristol will work with science festival managers at MIT and the ̽��ֱ�� of Cambridge to tackle several issues across the science events sectors in the UK and US. Ben Wiehe from the Science Festival Alliance office at the MIT Museum said:

“We know that millions of people are participating in live public science events every year in both the US and UK, but the contributions of these events are only just coming to be acknowledged as distinct, and there is little overall tracking of or advocacy for such activity. ̽��ֱ��organizers of these events are often not aware of each other’s efforts. We have a lot to learn from each other, but right now there is no straightforward way to share findings with the full range of event practitioners.”

̽��ֱ��Science Live pilot study is funded by the Science Learning+ initiative of the Wellcome Trust, the US-based National Science Foundation, and the UK-based Economic and Social Research Council. It aims to lead to a longer term effort to establish a set of key facts related to live science activities, and use those facts to build a coherent narrative explaining the role that live events play in the larger science learning ecosystem.

Laura Fogg Rogers, Science Communication Research Fellow at UWE said:

“This is an exciting time to drill down and find out what works best in communicating research to benefit society. This consortium has access to some of the best networks of public science events, including science festival networks in the UK and US, grass-roots activities, and government level initiatives. ̽��ֱ��potential to make an impact on the researcher and practitioner landscape is massive.”

NOTES FOR EDITORS

Science Live is a collaborative project of the MIT Museum and the ̽��ֱ�� of Cambridge, administered by the Science Festival Alliance office at the MIT Museum, and is led by Dr John Durant from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research partners include

Professor Bruce Lewenstein from Cornell ̽��ֱ��, Laura Fogg Rogers from ̽��ֱ�� of the West of England, and Dr Wai Yi Feng from the ̽��ֱ�� of Cambridge.

Science Live is funded through the Science Learning+ scheme, an international initiative established by the Wellcome Trust, the US National Science Foundation (NSF), and the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and in collaboration with the MacArthur Foundation, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and the Noyce Foundation. ̽��ֱ��scheme was launched in April 2014 after a review of informal learning commissioned by the Wellcome Trust indicated a need for further research to be undertaken in this area.

̽��ֱ��UK contact is Dane Comerford, from the ̽��ֱ�� of Cambridge Public Engagement Team and the US contact is Ben Wiehe from the Science Festival Alliance office at the MIT Museum.

Dane Comerford

Public Engagement Manager, ̽��ֱ�� of Cambridge

Phone: +44 (0)1223 764069

E-mail: dane.comerford@admin.cam.ac.uk

Ben Wiehe

Manager, Science Festival Alliance

Phone: +1 617.806.6369

E-mail: wiehe@mit.edu

A new transatlantic pilot study aims to better understand what makes science events tick.

These activities range from festivals, science busking and trips to nature reserves, and involve about half of the UK population. ̽��ֱ��project, called Science Live, will explore the differences between the huge varieties of live science events and will develop research questions about how they affect their audiences.

This consortium has access to some of the best networks of public science events, including science festival networks in the UK and US, grass-roots activities, and government level initiatives. ̽��ֱ��potential to make an impact on the researcher and practitioner landscape is massive.

Laura Fogg Rogers, Science Communication Research Fellow at UWE, Bristol

Around half the UK population access science activities every year.

̽��ֱ��text in this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence. If you use this content on your site please link back to this page. For image rights, please see the credits associated with each individual image.

Yes

̽��ֱ�� ̽��ֱ�� and its publics

tdk25 — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000

̽��ֱ��question of ‘public engagement’ for universities is rising up the political agenda. Universities are increasingly being asked to demonstrate their work in knowledge transfer with community groups and the public, as well as with business.

Science and technology – public engagement

‘Blind faith in the men in white coats has gone and isn’t coming back.’ This statement by the polling organisation, MORI describes the damage to public trust in science following controversies in the media concerning BSE, GM foods and the MMR vaccine among others.

In response to this mistrust, a plethora of ‘public engagement with science’ initiatives have recently emerged in the UK. At its most ambitious, this activity aims at the open exchange and sharing of knowledge, ideas, values and beliefs between scientists, the public(s), stakeholders and decision-makers.

‘Sciencewise’ is a Government programme which illustrates a growing commitment from policymakers and scientists to engage the public ‘upstream’ with consultations on new technologies. In addition to seeking advice from scientists and social scientists (as provided by the Cambridge ̽��ֱ�� Government Policy Programme, for example), there is a national programme of public dialogue on issues of scientific concern. ̽��ֱ�� ̽��ֱ�� of Cambridge actively supports this as demonstrated by its sponsorship of the ‘Nano Jury UK’ last year. A five-week long citizens’ jury on nanotechnologies gave the public the opportunity to become part of the debate as to how this emerging and potentially revolutionary technology should develop.

̽��ֱ�� ̽��ֱ�� also holds a number of public talks, discussions and debates each year, publicised through events such as the Cambridge Science Festival and the Darwin Lecture series.

Future scientists

̽��ֱ��downward trend in the number of school pupils studying science and embarking on scientific degrees and careers is another incentive for scientists to engage new audiences. In the last 10 years, 21 physics departments have been reportedly closed at British universities.

According to a Royal Society survey (2006), pressures on scientists to spend time on research and teaching act as a barrier to getting more involved with public engagement of science. This is not true for the ̽��ֱ�� of Cambridge. Over 1000 scientific staff and students are involved in 50 or more science educational outreach projects at the ̽��ֱ��.

̽��ֱ��‘Millennium Maths Project’ works with hundreds of schools throughout the UK – its web resources received 6.4 million visits last year. ̽��ֱ��Department of Physics has a year-round programme of educational outreach activity, including its popular Physics at Work days each September which bring in 2500 school pupils to meet commercial and academic scientists. ̽��ֱ��Cambridge Science Festival takes place every March, during National Science and Engineering Week, attracting over 25,000 visitors of all ages to 100 free events throughout the ̽��ֱ��. These initiatives cross-over with the ̽��ֱ��’s widening participation and aspiration-raising work, and involve pupils of all ages from primary school upwards.

̽��ֱ�� ̽��ֱ��’s Humanitarian Centre is a new initiative bringing together research and outreach work for community benefit worldwide. Fifteen relief and development organisations including ‘Engineers without Borders’ and ‘Architecture sans Frontières’ are collaborating on sharing resources and placing students in positions to offer humanitarian assistance.

Arts, humanities and social science

̽��ֱ��arts, humanities and social sciences often by their very nature engage with the wider community and they play a complementary role to the sciences in engaging with audiences external to the ̽��ֱ��. In fact, much of the understanding of good practice in public engagement with science has come from social studies of this field. Dr Robert Doubleday is a social scientist who until recently was based at the Centre for Nanoscience. Now at the Department of Geography, he works with scientists to investigate the social and ethical dimensions of their research. He was also active in the ‘Nano Jury’ project.

Numerous researchers in arts, humanities and social sciences interact with external audiences regularly as part of their studies, and the results often directly impact on the wider world. ̽��ֱ�� ̽��ֱ��’s Centre for Family Research is one such example, with its close connections with the health service, the education system, child and adult psychiatry, clinical genetics, adoption and family lawyers.

̽��ֱ�� ̽��ֱ�� museums are active in engaging the public with the impressive collections held by the ̽��ֱ�� for the benefit of all. ̽��ֱ�� ̽��ֱ�� is a significant investor in 10 museums and collections for the local community. ̽��ֱ��Fitzwilliam Museum receives 300,000 visits each year and their initiatives include taking art to patients at Addenbrooke’s Hospital and planning virtual visits to the Museum for inmates at nine English prisons. Notable other cultural amenities for the public provided by the ̽��ֱ�� include Kettle’s Yard, the ADC Theatre and concerts at West Road Concert Hall. At the ̽��ֱ�� Library, half of its readers’ tickets are held by people who are not ̽��ֱ�� members but are eligible to use the Library for academic research.

Modern languages were dropped as a compulsory school subject in 2002, leading to widespread concern that students will not be prepared with language-learning skills for the future. In response, the ̽��ֱ�� Language Centre has worked with six schools in Cambridgeshire to offer teaching in a language that their school cannot offer otherwise. This scheme is rolling out to north-east England and other locations.

̽��ֱ��Cambridge Schools Classics Project was established in 1966 and has played a vital role in keeping Classics in UK school education by creating innovative teaching and learning materials.

And finally, not to be outdone by the popularity of the Cambridge Science Festival, a Festival of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences – or as it might be configured, a ‘Festival of Ideas’ – is planned at the ̽��ֱ�� in October 2008.

̽��ֱ��future

Now that the ̽��ֱ��’s public audience exists on a local, national and global scale, can we move beyond the ‘show and tell’ and ‘parallel play’ model of community engagement? Can we continue to enter into ‘genuine collaboration with community partners in fields which may be long-term, uncertain and genuinely risky’, as David Watson, Professor of Higher Education Management at the Institute of Education urges universities to do?

Pro-Vice-Chancellor Dr Kate Pretty certainly thinks so: ‘ ̽��ֱ�� ̽��ֱ��’s public engagement work stretches back over 150 years and more, looking back to the foundation of our Continuing Education programme and the whole area of work, including examinations worldwide, are now run by Cambridge Assessment. These important parts of the ̽��ֱ��’s work are still going strong today and there is now a huge range of public engagement initiatives accessible via the Cambridge for All portal.’

For more information, please contact Nicola Buckley, Festivals and Outreach Co-ordinator (njb1010@cam.ac.uk) or go towww.cam.ac.uk/cambforall

̽��ֱ��question of 'public engagement' for universities is rising up the political agenda. Universities are increasingly being asked to demonstrate their work in knowledge transfer with community groups and the public, as well as with business.

Now that the ̽��ֱ��’s public audience exists on a local, national and global scale, can we move beyond the ‘show and tell’ and ‘parallel play’ model of community engagement?

Professor David Watson

̽��ֱ�� of Cambridge

Trinity College from street level

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence. If you use this content on your site please link back to this page.

Yes