Naked Mole-Rats: are these rodents immune to cancer?

amb206 — Wed, 02 Sep 2015 09:00:00 +0000

Scroll to the end of the article to listen to the podcast.

‘Bizarre’ is a kinder word than ‘ugly’ and may be a more accurate description when it comes to a rodent with remarkable attributes. ̽��ֱ��naked mole-rat might look a bit like a raw sausage with protruding teeth but its behaviour and physiology are fascinating.

Zoologists first began to explore the unusual lifestyle of the naked mole-rat in the 1970s, identifying it as the only known mammal to be ‘eusocial’. Rather like bees, naked mole-rats live in colonies in which powerful ‘queens’ control groups of as many as 300 animals.

Researchers soon discovered that this small animal, which is native to East Africa and lives exclusively underground, packs a number of other surprises. It is unique among mammals in being poikilothermic (cold blooded) and is extremely efficient in its use of resources.

When the naked mole-rat finds a calorie-packed underground tuber, it eats what it needs and then covers the tuber with soil so that it can continue growing, meaning that the naked mole-rat, like humans, farms its crops.

Now neuroscientists and others are focusing on the ways in which the naked mole-rat differs from other rodents (such as mice) in other unique respects as a means of understanding conditions such as ageing, cancer and pain.

Dr Ewan St. John Smith, a researcher in the Department of Pharmacology, is one of only two scientists in the UK to hold a Home Office licence that allows his group to keep and study naked mole-rats in laboratory conditions.

Naked mole-rats are not hard to keep – but they are difficult to breed successfully. Smith describes them as surprisingly endearing. “If you hold a mouse in the palm of your hand, it will often try to escape or pee on you! Naked mole-rats are really playful.”

Smith has been studying the naked mole-rat for the past ten years, moving from a broad interest in the animal’s peripheral sensory system (e.g. how the animals detect noxious stimuli) to focus on molecular and cellular mechanisms that enable healthy brain function throughout their long lives.

By understanding the physiology of the naked mole-rat, and its differences with that of mice, Smith and colleagues are helping to pinpoint mechanisms that might, in the future, help clinicians to treat human conditions.

Just one of the significant differences between naked mole-rats and other small rodents is their long and healthy life span: typically they live for 30 years against an average of two to three years for mice.

“Naked mole-rats age quickly right at the end of their lives – and the females remain fertile right to the end, sometimes producing as many as 20 offspring in a single litter,” said Smith.

An apparent resistance to the cancers which shorten the average lives of most mammals is likely to be a key reason for this longevity. “At this point in time, it might be an overstatement to suggest that naked mole-rats don’t get cancer,” says Smith.

“What we can say is that none of the animals examined in the course of autopsy studies in both zoos and research institutes has been shown to have a tumour. We can’t be completely sure they don’t develop cancer, but it’s certainly true that they are resistant to change on a cellular level.”

Another claim often made about naked mole-rats is that they don’t feel pain. Again, this is only partly true.

“Naked mole-rats do feel pain in response to stimuli such as heat and mechanical threats just as mice do,” says Smith. “But, unlike most other mammals, they do not react to acid-induced pain such as lemon juice, nor do they experience the burning sensation induced by capsaicin – the chemical found in chillies that produces their hotness.”

̽��ֱ��naked mole-rat’s resistance to acid-induced pain is thought to stem from its underground life style: the labyrinths of burrows in which colonies live are high in carbon dioxide and low in oxygen. Carbon dioxide produces acid when it mixes with bodily fluids and naked mole-rats have developed an insensitivity to acid-induced pain, which enables them to live in a habitat that to many other mammals would be toxic.

In a study published in 2011, Smith and colleagues discovered that the acid-insensitivity is likely to be the result of a variation in a protein that is responsible for sending electric signals in nerves from the periphery to the spinal cord. ̽��ֱ��naked mole-rat version of this protein is switched off by acid, which, like a local anaesthetic at the dentist, then prevents painful signals reaching the central nervous system.

“Identification of the differences between how the nervous system functions on a molecular level between species is the key to understanding more about the incredibly complex ways in which the human nervous system functions – and may, in the long term, help us to set targets for the development of new therapies for treatment of conditions such as chronic pain,” said Smith.

Next in the Cambridge Animal Alphabet: O is for a bird that is inspiring physicists to make wind turbines that are more efficient and less noisy.

Have you missed the series so far? Catch up on Medium here.

Inset images: Naked mole-rats (Ewan St. John Smith).

The Cambridge Animal Alphabet series celebrates Cambridge's connections with animals through literature, art, science and society. Here, N is for Naked Mole-Rats, which won't win any beauty contests, but can live for 30 years and may be able to help in the development of new therapies for chronic pain.

It’s certainly true that they are resistant to change on a cellular level

Ewan St. John Smith

Playful naked mole-rats

Ewan St. John Smith

Naked Mole-rat

̽��ֱ��text in this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. For image use please see separate credits above.

Yes

From Mexican wave to retinal wave: why sharing data is good for science

jfp40 — Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:40:34 +0000

Now, researchers at Cambridge, York, Newcastle and Imperial College London have developed a system allowing neurophysiologists to share raw data with each other, something they hope will generate new discoveries in the field. ̽��ֱ��results are published in the journal GigaScience.

̽��ֱ��first type of data they collected and standardised are recordings of so called ‘retinal waves’. During early development, retinal neurons generate signals that rapidly spread across from one cell to another, much like a Mexican wave in a football stadium. These patterns of activity are thought to help forge the neural connections from the eye to the brain.

To record retinal waves, scientists use multielectrode arrays (tiny electrical devices). In this research, the team took 366 recordings from 12 different studies published between 1993 and 2014, converted them all to HDF5 – a standard open source format – and published them in a web-based ‘virtual laboratory’ called CARMEN.

According to lead author Dr Stephen Eglen from the Cambridge Computational Biology Institute: “Unlike other fields such as genomics, there hasn’t been much public data sharing in neuroscience, which could be because the data are heterogeneous and hard to annotate, or because researchers are reluctant to share data with a competitor.”

But Eglen believes there is much to be gained by a more cooperative approach. “There are two main benefits to sharing,” he said. “As well as leading to other collaborations and more interesting research, it also means that other people can check what you’ve done, which leads to more robust research. And if the taxpayer funds research, then I think it’s important for those results to be publicly available.”

CARMEN was a pilot project funded by the EPSRC, and is now supported by the BBSRC.

From the way we learn, to how our memories are made and stored, the workings of our brains depend on connections forged between billions of neurons, yet much about how our nervous system develops remains a mystery.

There are two main benefits to sharing. As well as leading to other collaborations and more interesting research, it also means that other people can check what you’ve done, which leads to more robust research.

Dr Stephen Eglen

Oyvind Solstad

Eye 9

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence. If you use this content on your site please link back to this page.

Yes

Licence type:

Attribution

̽��ֱ�� of Cambridge - neurophysiology

Naked Mole-Rats: are these rodents immune to cancer?

Playful naked mole-rats

From Mexican wave to retinal wave: why sharing data is good for science