Nicklinson - 探花直播Right to Die?

Nicola Padfield explores some aspects of the important decision of the Supreme Court in Nicklinson (R (Nicklinson and another) v Ministry of Justice; R (AM) v 探花直播DPP [2014] UKSC 38) focusing on the minority judgement of Baroness Hale.

探花直播law currently draws a horribly artificial divide between 鈥榢illing鈥 and 鈥榣etting die鈥, which means that those people who can breathe without artificial help are denied a choice which is available to those who cannot breath alone.

Nicola Padfield

Law in Focus is a collection of short videos featuring academics from the 探花直播 of Cambridge鈥檚 Faculty of Law, addressing legal issues in current affairs and the news.

鈥溾n individual鈥檚 right to decide by what means and at what point his or her life will end, provided he or she is capable of freely reaching a decision on this question and acting in consequence, is one of the aspects of the right to respect for private life within the meaning of article 8 of the Convention [right to private and family life].鈥 So said the European Court of Human Rights in Haas v Switzerland (2013) 56 EHRR 6, at para 51.

However section 2 of the Suicide Act 1961 makes it a criminal offence to encourage or assist the suicide of another person. Should it be an offence for anyone in any circumstances to help someone commit suicide? Nine judges in the Supreme Court considered a series of questions, which included the constitutional and somewhat technical question of whether it was for the judiciary to strike down section 2, or whether they should leave the question to Parliament. By a majority of seven to two, they voted not to issue a declaration that section 2 is incompatible with article 8.

探花直播text in this work is licensed under a . If you use this content on your site please link back to this page. For image rights, please see the credits associated with each individual image.